Actual screenshots from the DDxHelper workspace — from live encounter capture to the reviewable drafts it produces. All examples shown use synthetic, illustrative clinical content only; no real patient information appears anywhere. Click any screenshot to open it full size.
A capture in progress. The provider sees the diarized transcript build in real time — every turn labeled Provider or Patient, with symptoms, conditions, and procedures tagged as they're mentioned. Alongside it: audio capture status, a draft clinical summary in SOAP form, top coding suggestions, and the Safety & Workflow panel. Everything shown is a draft awaiting provider review.
Each tab in the workspace gives the provider a different view of the same encounter — all built from the captured conversation, all subject to provider review and approval.
The structured note drafted from the visit — Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan, each section editable. The draft is explicitly marked as requiring provider review; nothing is signed without provider approval.
ICD-10-CM and CPT suggestions tied to documented findings, each with the transcript evidence that motivated it, a confidence indicator, and an explicit review status such as "Needs provider review." Final code selection always remains with the provider or coder.
Clinically relevant concepts surfaced from the conversation — symptoms and procedures categorized with the context they appeared in. These extracted terms feed the note structure, coding suggestions, and differential support.
Potential differentials organized by alignment with the documented picture, each with its supporting findings and caveats. The banner states it plainly: differential output is assistive and must be reviewed by a licensed healthcare professional.
Relevant history at a glance — social history, allergies, and prior encounters, each dated and sourced — so the provider can weigh today's visit against what is already known.
Actionable notices surfaced during the encounter — from clinical review prompts, such as checking allergies and local guidance before antibiotic therapy, to workflow states like capture status — each acknowledged explicitly by the provider.
DDxHelper's encounter-scoped assistant — ask about evidence in the transcript, coding suggestions, or draft SOAP language, with answers grounded in the selected encounter. As the interface itself states, output must be reviewed by a licensed provider.
All screenshots show synthetic, illustrative clinical content only. DDxHelper output is drafted for provider review — clinical decisions remain with the licensed healthcare professional.